Failure Mode and Effects Analysis – Anticipating and Reducing Risk Before It Occurs
1. The Problem It Solves
In many manufacturing organizations, risks are addressed reactively. Problems are fixed after defects occur, deliveries are missed, or customers complain. Even when root causes are identified, new issues often appear elsewhere in the process.
This happens because improvement efforts focus on current problems but fail to anticipate how changes, variation, or complexity can introduce new risks. Teams improve one area while unknowingly weakening another.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) exists to solve this problem. It provides a structured way to identify and prioritize risks proactively, before they result in defects, failures, or customer impact.
2. The Core Idea in Plain Language
FMEA is a systematic method to identify how a process or product could fail, assess the consequences, and prioritize preventive action.
The core idea is simple:
Not all risks are equal. Some failures are more likely, more severe, or harder to detect than others.
By evaluating failure modes based on severity, occurrence, and detection, FMEA helps teams focus effort where it reduces risk most effectively. It shifts thinking from reaction to prevention.
3. How It Works in Real Life
FMEA is typically conducted by a cross-functional team with knowledge of the process, product, and customer requirements. The team reviews each process step and asks how it could fail.
For each potential failure mode, the team assesses:
-
Severity of the impact if the failure occurs
-
Occurrence likelihood of the failure
-
Detection ability to identify the failure before it reaches the customer
These ratings help prioritize risks and define actions to prevent, reduce, or detect failures more effectively.
FMEA is not a one-time activity. It evolves as processes change and improvements are implemented.
4. A Practical Example from a Manufacturing Environment
Consider a medium-sized manufacturer introducing a process improvement to reduce cycle time. While performance improves, quality complaints increase unexpectedly.
By applying FMEA, the team identifies that reduced inspection time increases the risk of undetected defects at a critical step. Severity is high, and detection is weak.
Preventive actions are introduced, such as improved error-proofing and targeted in-process checks. Cycle time gains are maintained without increasing quality risk.
FMEA helps balance improvement and risk.
5. What Makes It Succeed or Fail
FMEA fails when it becomes a paperwork exercise. Generic failure modes and copied ratings provide little value.
Another common failure is conducting FMEA without linking it to real actions. Identifying risks without mitigation creates false confidence.
Leadership behavior matters. Leaders must ensure FMEA drives decisions and investments, not just documentation.
Successful FMEA focuses on learning, prioritization, and prevention.
How FMEA Connects to Other Six Sigma Tools
FMEA builds on Process Mapping and CTQs to identify where failures matter most.
It supports Improve phase solution selection by evaluating risk.
It informs Control Plans by highlighting critical controls.
It complements DOE by anticipating unintended consequences.
FMEA ensures that improvement reduces risk rather than redistributing it.
Closing Reflection
FMEA helps organizations think ahead. It replaces surprise failures with informed prevention and strengthens the robustness of improvement efforts.
In manufacturing environments where risk translates directly into cost, safety, or customer impact, this discipline is essential.
